Current:Home > ContactRuling blocks big changes to Utah citizen initiatives but lawmakers vow appeal -AssetTrainer
Ruling blocks big changes to Utah citizen initiatives but lawmakers vow appeal
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:20:29
Utah voters won’t decide this November on a proposal to amend the state constitution that would let state lawmakers rewrite voter-approved ballot measures but the question will remain on ballots with just weeks to go until the election, a judge ruled Thursday.
Legislative leaders vowed to appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.
Salt Lake County District Judge Dianna Gibson sided with the League of Women Voters and others who challenged the measure, agreeing that it carries misleading ballot language and has not been advertised in newspapers statewide as required.
To keep ballot-printing and other election deadlines on track, the amendment will still be on Utah ballots in November but won’t be counted.
The ballot language — which says the change would “strengthen the initiative process” — is not only misleading but says the opposite of what the amendment would actually do, a League of Women Voters attorney argued in a hearing Wednesday.
Gibson agreed in her ruling.
“The short summary the Legislature chose does not disclose the chief feature, which is also the most critical constitutional change — that the Legislature will have unlimited right to change laws passed by citizen initiative,” Gibson wrote.
An attorney for Utah lawmakers stood by the ballot language in the hearing. But lawmakers’ argument that extensive media coverage of the proposed amendment suffices for statewide publication also didn’t sway the judge.
“No evidence has been presented that either the Legislature or the lieutenant governor ‘has caused’ the proposed constitutional amendment to appear in any newspaper in Utah,” Gibson wrote, referring to the publication requirement in Utah law.
The amendment stems from a Utah Supreme Court ruling in July which upheld a ban on drawing district lines to protect incumbents or favor a political party. Lawmakers responded by seeking the ability to limit such voter-approved measures.
Meeting in a special session in late August, they approved the state constitutional amendment for voters to decide in November.
Opponents who sued Sept. 5 to block the proposed amendment have been up against tight deadlines, with less two months to go until the election.
In Wednesday’s hearing, Gibson asked Tyler Green, an attorney for the lawmakers being sued, whether some responsibility for the tight deadline fell to the Legislature.
“The legislature can’t move on a dime,” Green responded.
Legislative leaders in a statement criticized Gibson’s ruling as a “policy-making action from the bench.”
“It’s disheartening that the courts – not the 1.9 million Utah voters – will determine the future policies of our state. This underscores our concerns about governance by initiative,” said the statement by Senate President President J. Stuart Adams and House Speaker Mike Schultz.
The statement blamed organizers in Washington, D.C., with “seemingly unlimited funds” for the ruling and vowed to “exhaust all options” including a state supreme court appeal.
The amendment has been a “power hungry” attempt to silence voter voices, Salt Lake County Democratic Party Chairman Jade Velazquez said in a statement.
“We must be prepared for more attempts by the Republicans in our Legislature to expand their power at the expense of Utahns’ freedoms,” Velazquez said.
The proposed amendment springs from a 2018 ballot measure that created an independent commission to draw legislative districts every decade. The ballot measure has met ongoing resistance from the Republican-dominated Legislature.
In 2020, lawmakers stripped from it a ban on gerrymandering. Then, when the commission drew up a new congressional map, they ignored it and passed its own.
The map split Democratic-leaning Salt Lake City into four districts, each of which is now represented by a Republican.
veryGood! (98799)
Related
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- The drought across Europe is drying up rivers, killing fish and shriveling crops
- California will ban sales of new gasoline-powered cars by 2035
- Climate Change Is Tough On Personal Finances
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- How Vanessa Hudgens Knew Cole Tucker Was the One to Marry
- California is poised to phase out sales of new gas-powered cars
- These Survivor 44 Contestants Are Dating After Meeting on the Island
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Ryan Seacrest's Girlfriend Aubrey Paige Pens Message to Inspiring Host on His Last Day at Live
Ranking
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- We’re Not Alright After Learning Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson Might Be Brothers
- New Zealand's national climate plan includes possibly seeking higher ground
- Ukrainians have a special place in their hearts for Boris Johnson
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Pete Davidson Sets the Record Straight on His BDE
- Olivia Culpo’s Guide to Coachella: Tips and Tricks To Make the Most of Festival Season
- The Exact Moment Love Is Blind’s Paul Decided What to Tell Micah at Altar
Recommendation
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Meet the teenager who helped push Florida toward cleaner energy
War in Ukraine is driving demand for Africa's natural gas. That's controversial
Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson Might Be Related, but All of These Celebs Actually Are
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
The strange underground economy of tree poaching
We’re Not Alright After Learning Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson Might Be Brothers
California will ban sales of new gasoline-powered cars by 2035